Friday, 9 December 2011

A Black Student is a Black Student is a Black Student

Although I have been a member of the faculty and then staff of an HBCU for almost forty years, I have never been comfortable with an attitude held by a small cadre of my colleagues, namely: that the black students at HBCUs were somehow more important than the black students who attended non-HBCUs, that they were the true carriers of the black high culture, and that they would inevitably become the most eminent leaders of the black community.

This always struck me as the ultimate "blacker than thou game" ... and the most dangerous. Why? Because it tempts HBCUs into untenable arrogance -- to rest on the hard-earned laurels of their past achievements and neglect the equally hard work that will be required to attain comparable achievements in the future, and to politically naive expectations that HBCUs are entitled to American society's future support because of the substantial contributions that HBCUs made to that society in the past. But perhaps the most dangerous of all, it distracts HBCU educators from their historic mission, i.e., the education of black students.

The historic mission of HBCUs was to provide educational opportunities for the black students within their own institutions. This made sense in a bygone era when HBCUS enrolled over 90 percent of all African American college students. But given that HBCU enrollment of African American students today is closer to 10 percent and declining, it is a recipe for extinction. Close to 90 percent and rising of today's African American students attend non-HBCUs, the integrated mainstream institutions, integrated by virtue of the courageous efforts of the Civil Rights activists of the 1960s and 1970s who risked their lives to bring an end to the injustice of the American systems of de jure and de facto segregation.

Unfortunately, the victorious legacy of their bravery has been undermined by substantial and persistent academic achievement gaps between black and white students at those mainstream institutions. Where should African American students and their families look to for leadership in the strenuous and longterm efforts that will be required to close these gaps in the future? I submit that HBCUs must play an outsized role in this struggle. Most of us who became members of the faculty and staffs of HBCUs in the past did so because we thought that HBCUs were the places where we could best leverage our limited talents to help provide the best educational opportunities for the greatest number of black students. I submit that HBCUs still offer those advantages today ... but only if we broaden our perspectives to include an abiding concern for the the 90 percent of America's black students who don't attend HBCUs.

Mind you, I am not suggesting that the faculty and staff at non-HBCUs should not be concerned about enhancing the opportunities they provide to their black students. I am merely acknowledging that these other institutions will find it more difficult to focus their creative energies on their black students lest they be accused of neglecting the needs of the vast majority, i.e., their non-black students.
  • I am suggesting that HBCUs must become national centers for the development, assessment, and dissemination of educational innovations that improve the academic performance of their own black students AND of the academic performance of black students everywhere else.
  • And given that successful alumni are the ultimate proof of the effectiveness of innovations in education, I am also suggesting that HBCUs should not only celebrate the achievements of their own alumni; they should also celebrate the achievements of black alumni from everywhere else ...  if only because non-HBCUs seem to be so reluctant to take pride in their own black success stories. Yes, it's important for black students at the University of XYZ to learn during Black History Month that an eminent black scientist, engineer, or financial analyst graduated from an HBCU forty years ago; but it would be even better for those black students to learn about the eminent black scientists, engineers, and financial analysts who graduated from their own U of XYZ twenty years ago.
__________________________
Related notes:

Monday, 10 October 2011

Monday, 26 September 2011

Google+ vs. Facebook

Google opened membership in Google+  to the general public this week (Monday 20 September 2011) with its Web pages firing provocative shots across Facebook's bow:
  • "Google+ makes connecting on the web more like connecting in the real world. Share your thoughts, links and photos with the right circles."
  • "You share different things with different people. But sharing the right stuff with the right people shouldn’t be a hassle. Circles make it easy to put your friends from Saturday night in one circle, your parents in another, and your boss in a circle by himself, just like real life."         
In other words, Google is positioning Google+ ... a/k/a "GPlus" and "G+" ... as a Facebook killer. In my opinion, this is a marketing blunder because it presumes that a substantial portion of Facebook's 800 million users want their social network platform to create accurate cyberspace models of their real-life social networks. 

I'll grant that most Facebook members might welcome a few more categories beyond friends, friends of friends, and everyone on the Internet. Indeed, Facebook recently introduced a new category called "close friends". However I doubt that most Facebook users want to carefully calibrate their social relationships, upgrading some from time to time, downgrading others. This makes me suspect that the designers of G+ confused the broad sociological concept of "social networks" that embraces all human relationships with the colloquial denotation of "social networks" that refers to social life after working hours. 

Yes, G+ really does enable its users to easily construct far more accurate models of their social relationships than Facebook:
  • G+ allows users to create as many social circles as they want, assign whatever names they want, and create circles that overlap. In other words, a G+ user can put a contact into more than one circle.

  • And because users can provide any names to their circles, G+ permits users to define mixed and negative categories, such as "adversary" "competitor" "enemy" "frenemy" and "mortal enemy"

  • But best of all, a user's social models on G+ are as private as the models they carry in their heads because the names of a user's circles and the members of those circles are secrets that remain hidden from the other users of G+ ... Contrast this to Facebook's requirement that "friends" must mutually friend each other and that a user's list of friends can be seen by other Facebook members.
While I can't imagine that most Facebook users would want to create such refined categories of positive and negative relationships for their after hours social lives, I am equally certain that most white collar professionals will relish the availability of a well-designed free tool that could help them manage the complex, overlapping relationships in their workplace. 

In the workplace we see each other as members of overlapping teams, as providers of the particular skills and resources we need for our projects, as competitors for advancement, as frenemies, as dangerous enemies, etc, etc, etc. And we are forced to recalibrate our working relationships from time to time. So-called "office friendships" are more like diplomatic alliances -- maintained for only so long as they are useful. In the workplace we have to be careful about what we say, to whom, and when we say it. All of which brings me to the following insight:
  • G+ is for 9 to 5 
  • Facebook is for evenings and weekends
In other words, G+ can advance our careers; whereas Facebook can enhance our social lives. G+ is for success; Facebook is for fun. The G+ circles will help us channel our messages to the precise recipients we need to reach; whereas Facebook allows us to interact with people we didn't even know existed (friends of friends ... and their friends) until they added a comment to one of our posts. To be sure, we should expect G+ and Facebook to copy each other's features from time to time. But these platforms serve fundamentally different purposes and require fundamentally different expectations from their users. Nevertheless, the same people could use both.

I close with a few caveats and predictions: 
  • As Internet applications go, Facebook has been around for a long time -- so its underlying code is relatively mature, i.e, it's debugged, easy to learn, and easy to use. By contrast, G+ just popped out of beta testing (with 20 million beta testers); so it may still contain glitches that early users might find discouraging enough to walk away after giving it a few tries.
  • And there's always the possibility that a competitor for managing social relationships in the workplace will roar out of nowhere with a more appealing platform.  However, I think G+ has some built in advantages that will enable it to buy sufficient time to overcome its current defects and to ward off would-be competitors.

    Indeed, LinkedIn is probably the most likely competitor for workspace social networks. Whereas G+ helps users manage their relationships on their jobs, LinkedIn is for users who don't have jobs or are looking for better jobs. So LinkedIn might expand to cover users' relationships on their jobs ... or Google might buy LinkedIn ... :-)
  • Users who try G+ will be pleased by its tight integration with Google's other cloud-based applications that have gained widespread popularity -- e.g., Gmail, YouTube, Google docs, Picassa, blogs, calendar, and discussion forums -- all of which have powerful features that facilitate document sharing and collaboration. It also has a special app for smart phones running Google's popular Android operating system. (An app for iPhones is forthcoming)
  • Finally, in my opinion the G+ video chat feature called "hangouts" is the icing on the cake that will greatly enhance the value of its underlying circles. Being able to convene online video meetings with just the right people should interest a wide variety of knowledge workers, but I expect that IT professionals, salespersons, planners, design teams, management groups, project teams, students, faculty, community organizers, and political activists will find this feature especially appealing -- and all the more so if they also use Google's other cloud-based applications and attend these meetings via their iPhones or Android smart phones ... :-)

Readers interested in learning more about G+ are referred to the following discussions:

From HBCUs to BCUs

This post was published on 8/3/10 by Inside Higher Education and can be found here:

http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2010/08/03/beasley

_____________________
Related notes:

Saturday, 2 July 2011

Tuesday, 28 June 2011

Academically Adrift -- A Dissenting View

This note was published by Inside Higher Education on 6/27/11
under the title "The Wrong Message." (The new title was their editor's choice)
Girls Generation - Korean